BulletinsCalendar of EventsDirectoryDirectorySouthern Links

Welcome to the website for the Southern Association of Agricultural Experiment Station Directors! This site's purpose is to encourage collaboration among agricultural scientists in the South as well as inform the funders of agricultural research about research priorities, impacts, and status of projects.

Home Infobook Impact Statements Collaboration Assistance NIMSS Research Priorities Bulletins ESCOP Directors only CRIS & REEIS Archive
More helpful Links


(As told by Dr. Doyle Chambers and presented to SAAESD in April, 1998, by outgoing chair, Dr. D. C. Coston)

The symbol of authority for the Southern Association of Agricultural Experiment Station Directors (SAAESD) is not the traditional gavel. It is a pocket knife that is laid on the table when meetings are open and passed from chairman to chairman. The beginning date of this tradition is uncertain, but the best guess is that it originated at the spring meeting in March, 1958 or in March, 1961 -- no one is quite sure which. In 1992, Dr. Gale Buchanan, Chair, purchased a wooden box and placed an inscription on the top, thus creating an official "resting place" for the knife.

Dr. Doyle Chambers, Director Emeritus of the Louisiana Agricultural Experiment Station, met on November 14, 1997 with the Louisiana participants in the ESCOP/ACOP Leadership Class. He was asked to relate the story of this symbol of authority for the SAAESD. The legend related by Dr. Chambers, which was unrehearsed and without notes, follows.

It is an interesting story. It came out of some complications that you always get into when you have new legislation and new programs to administer, the guidelines of which are not always very clear to the Directors and sometimes not very useful. Sometimes they are real impediments to getting the job done. When the Hatch Act was revised, in 1957 I think it was, they had one paragraph in there (paragraph 3C3) which says that up to 25% of such federal funds as are appropriated under this act as payments to the states can be used to support cooperative research conducted by two or more states and it's called a regional research fund. It is part of the Hatch moneys from that time on. So the Department of Agriculture and the Directors agreed that, in the original version of the administration of the regional research fund, the Directors would decide on what projects they wanted to work on together. The Directors would administer the funds as a single pot at the regional level. In the south S-1 was the cotton breeding project and nearly everyone had cotton so everybody wanted to participate and everybody, of course, wanted some of the money that went with the project. S-2 was a dairy project and S-3, S-4, S-5, etc. were others in various areas. S-10 happened to be a beef cattle project with which I was affiliated for many years.

The Directors decided how much money was to be allocated from the Regional Research Fund to a particular project. Then the Directors let the technical committee on a project vote on how much each state got. The technical committee was composed of a scientist from each state that participated. Certainly, this led to feuds at that level.

But, there were also concerns at the Directors' level. The Directors were always fighting over whether or not to fund a project on beef cattle or cotton or peanuts or sugar cane or whatever some Director wanted. Whether or not a particular project would be considered worthy of funding was decided at the Director's meetings by votes.

To prepare for these meetings, the Directors decided they should have a regional research committee that would come to them with recommendations on this complicated affair. The regional research committee would review project proposals and would recommend either approval or disapproval of each to the Directors association. You could imagine the difficulties you have when you have states from Virginia to Texas and Oklahoma back to Florida including exotic states like Louisiana that had a completely different agriculture than many of the others.

In any event Mr. Taggert who was Director here in Louisiana thought that the regional research program was a silly requirement and for a long time he refused to let any of his staff members participate in regional research. He said it was only 15 cents on the dollar and it costs you 85 cents to get 15 cents so he thought it was stupid. He declined to get in knowing, I guess, what he was going to run into when he went forward with a regional project proposal. But, finally he began to submit regional projects, especially one on sugar cane which was his glory. Taggert came out of the Sugar Station in New Orleans when it was moved to Baton Rouge.

The regional research committee always included directors from some of the more enthusiastic regional research states. They managed to get on nominating committees and kept themselves in power. Don Lewis in Texas, Cummings from North Carolina and Welch from Kentucky served as the committee for many years. Mr. Taggert had submitted several projects and they were always turned down by the regional research committee.

At a Directors meeting in New Orleans Mr. Taggert had the sugar project submitted for consideration. Director Young from Virginia was presiding with Don Lewis from Texas representing the Director's regional research committee. So, the agenda got to Mr. Taggert's project. Lewis reported that the committee had recommended 'no' on the approval of the project for funding under the regional research fund. Mr. Taggert weighed about 125 pounds, had two or three fingers missing on one hand (had been ground off in a sugar mill) and had only one eye I think. He was a pretty wiry looking critter and he jumped up when the negative recommendation came in. Don Lewis was about the same height as Mr. Taggert, a little short fellow, but he weighed about 200 pounds. He was sitting across the table.

Mr. Taggert gets up and he says "Gentlemen of the Southern Directors. During the last century many pestilences have come out of Texas--tick fever, the boll weevil, the screw worm and now this s_ _ of a b_ _ _ _ Don Lewis." Don Lewis tried to grab him from across the table and the Directors had lost their decorum by that time. Director Young slammed on the table and said, "The Southern Directors will be in recess until1 o'clock this afternoon." That was about 10:30 in the morning. He gave them a cooling off period. He came back at 1 o'clock, he pulled out a knife that he had bought down on Canal Street and he opened it up and he says "The Southern Directors will be in order." That's the version that I recall of what happened.

The result of that exchange was that they changed the procedures drastically. The Directors no longer had the technical committees vote on allocations. The regional research funds go to the states by formula as part of the Hatch funds and each state had a share that it could spend on whatever projects the Director in each state decided to put it on. Directors still have that authority.


Maintained by: Donna Pearce, Assistant to the Director